![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png){kind=small}
alt_linusNow that the fluctuations have settled, I have been applying rough approximations based on tonight's data to the results of Scansell's sheaf analysis, Wrdjeman's patterning application, and Kantorowich's Least Worst regressions, run by myself and analysed by Evelyn, and according to everything I have tabulated, the wards may possibly remain at least partially up for a maximum of one hundred hours. That, however, represents the absolute outside of their viability.
The part of the news where Dame Fortune smiles upon us is that according to this model, there are no earthquakes, no tsunami, no rains of frogs, and no herds of spectral erumpents or anything of that nature. The remaining wards, tattered as they are, will simply vanish softly and silently away.
It's what the model suggests, at least. We shall of course find out whether practice matches theory. As the old saying has it:
In theory, there is no difference between theory and practice. In practice, there is.
The part of the news where Dame Fortune smiles upon us is that according to this model, there are no earthquakes, no tsunami, no rains of frogs, and no herds of spectral erumpents or anything of that nature. The remaining wards, tattered as they are, will simply vanish softly and silently away.
It's what the model suggests, at least. We shall of course find out whether practice matches theory. As the old saying has it:
In theory, there is no difference between theory and practice. In practice, there is.
Re: Private message to Jeremy
on 2015-08-30 04:28 am (UTC)